Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling effort has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That is why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition in an effort to force a vote that is statewide whether or not the casino projects is able to go ahead.
Those who are against the new casinos had been able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the lawyer general’s office. But unfortuitously for them, the continuing state solicitor but a stop towards the move, saying that the ballot question wouldn’t be legal beneath the state’s ballot initiative process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
Under the current state Constitution, the ballot initiative procedure is included in Article 48. That article not just outlines the process for getting question on the ballot, but additionally establishes what can and may not be included in such concerns. One of the rules for proposals says that they cannot restrict an entity’s ‘right to get settlement for private property appropriated to public use’.
In accordance with state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the question were to be approved by the public, thus ending the casino deals immediately, it would take the casino developers’ contract rights away without any compensation. It would also ‘impair the implied contracts’ between the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and those developers, who have paid millions in application fees to your state. Continue reading Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG