The marriage that is european (EMP)
The European wedding Pattern has first been described by Hajnal in 1965. A high age at marriage for both men and women, the second being ‘neolocality’ and the third a very large number of singles that never married at all although Hajnal did not give any details on how he thought this European Marriage Pattern had come into existence, he mentioned three features as being central to this pattern: the first being. Hajnal’s article has been cited repeatedly. Their some ideas have now been criticized, abused (fora on the web marketing Hajnal’s EMP along with numbers on urbanization and industrialization in to a debate on battle, trying to proof ‘germanic’ supremacy), also refined, with the addition of even more features.
Attributes of the EMP
A) a age that is high wedding both for women and men
The feature that is first a high age at wedding for both women and men: the mean age in the beginning wedding for females is finished 23 and also the mean chronilogical age of males is finished 26 (Hajnal 1982: 452). In their article ‘European wedding habits in perspective’, Hajnal provides but two options that come with the EMP (Hajnal 1965: 101):
- A higher age at wedding
- A proportion that is high of whom never marry after all
Their article, but, explores those features completely, increasing numerous concerns for further research.
Peter Laslett contributes to this particular aspect the age that is high of during child-birth (Laslett 1977: 13). This kind of age that is high childbirth, but, is seen as a primary result of the high age at wedding.
B) A small age gap between partners
A tiny age space between partners is in fact perhaps maybe not an element John Hajnal (1965) mentioned as a certain feature regarding the European Marriage Pattern. Continue reading Analysis Themes – Wedding Patterns. The European Wedding Pattern (EMP)